Real Estate Worldwide is delighted to hear the United Kingdom’s new International Education Strategy, announced this past weekend by the Department of Education and the Department for International Trade.
- Under a newly announced strategy, the UK aims to attract 600,000 international students by 2030, and to greatly increase the value of its education exports
- Undergraduate and master’s students may stay for up to six months after graduating to work
- However, the success of the strategy may hinge on further immigration reforms
In a report from ICEF Monitor it explains, the strategy, which was created in consultation with stakeholders across the educational spectrum, includes two ambitious targets for 2030, as well as a policy change regarding international students’ ability to work after graduating. The targets for 2030 are:
- To nearly double the value of education exports to £35 billion (US$46 billion), which will require an average annual growth rate of 4% through 2030;
- To increase the number of international students to 600,000, substantially more than the roughly 460,000 enrolled now in British higher education.
The policy change is that all undergraduate and master’s degree students will be given unrestricted post-study work rights for six months, with doctoral students able to work for 12 months after graduating. Currently, all international graduates are permitted to stay on to work for four months, with PhD graduates able to apply for an additional year. In addition, the government notes,
“We will also make it easier for international higher education students to move into skilled work in the UK should they wish to do so, by allowing them to apply for a skilled work visa three months before their course ends, or to switch into skilled work from their home country for two years after graduation.”
This commitment to extending the period within which non-UK students can remain in the country to work after graduating is being welcomed by the university sector, which has long been urging the government to change its restrictive policies in this regard. The hope among university stakeholders was that the work leave period for international graduates would be extended to two years, and Professor Dame Janet Beer, president of Universities UK, said recently that “we will continue to urge them on this point.”
Still, notes Vivienne Stern, Director of Universities UK International (UUKi) and a member of the Department for International Trade international education advisory group, “While we don’t think [the extended work rights period] goes far enough … we should do our very best to explain to prospective students around the world that something good just happened.”
Representatives from the vocational sector, as well, praised the new strategy. Lesley Davies, Chair of the UK Skills Partnership, said: “It is heartening to see the ambition the government sets out in its International Strategy for the UK skills sector and the recognition of our track record of success in delivering high quality technical and vocational education and training solutions to international partners and businesses. We welcome the commitment made by the government to play a more active role in supporting the UK’s skill’s sector international business and we stand ready to deliver on this important agenda.”
In addition to the announcement of extended post-study work opportunities, the International Education Strategy also recognises the importance of employment concerns in general to international students’ decisions about where they will study. The document notes that,
“The UK Government will work with UUKi and sector to identify and share good practice in how universities effectively support international students into employment and further study, both here in the UK and when they return to their home nation. We will also work with the sector to enhance the evidence base on international graduate outcomes and to monitor the UK’s comparative position with respect to international student recruitment and the international student experience.”
In general, the strategy document emphasises the goal of making the UK more welcoming in all respects to international students.
Plans to review visa processes
While there was no policy change included in the International Education Strategy pertaining to a new visa processing approach, the document does signal that this area will be monitored for possible improvements going forward:
“The UK Government will keep the visa application process for international students under review, with the aim of improving the customer journey both for students and their sponsoring institutions. This will include reviewing processes for conducting interviews to ensure that these are appropriately focused and to minimise any inconvenience for applicants.”
Though welcoming of the overall International Education Strategy, Greg Walker, chief executive of MillionPlus, the Association for Modern Universities, cautioned that unless “major changes” to visa processes and the “arbitrary way in which compliance is assessed” occur, the twin targets of expanded international student numbers and increased economic exports may be difficult to achieve.
Nick Hillman, director of the Higher Education Policy Institute and former special adviser to the universities minister, added his own doubts about whether the strategy can succeed without the removal of international students from the net migration target. International students compose tens of thousands of people included in the scope of the policy to reduce immigration. Only the Home Office, responsible for immigration, can change this policy, a decision that would greatly support the goals of the International Education Strategy.
A Universities UK research study published last year determined that the UK’s immigration policy in recent years has contributed to up to £9 billion in lost export revenues between 2013 and 2017.
A strategy for uncertain and competitive times
It might not be supported by a change in the net migration policy or committed to two years of post-study work rights for international students. However, the new International Education Strategy is widely seen as a step in the right direction and an acknowledgement from the government that the sector is extremely valuable to the British economy, a great source of pride for the country, and an industry that is facing unprecedented competition from destinations including Australia and Canada.
With Brexit on the horizon and fears that a deal (or no-deal) may greatly affect flows of EU students to British institutions, the International Education Strategy prioritises four “high-value” regions in which to focus recruitment campaigns:
- China and Hong Kong;
- The Middle East and North Africa;
- Latin America;
- The ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) group of nations, which includes Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam.
In announcing the International Education Strategy, Education Secretary Damian Hinds said:
“The UK’s education system is world-leading and its reputation is the envy of many countries around the globe. As we prepare to leave the EU it is more important than ever to reach out to our global partners and maximise the potential of our best assets – that includes our education offer and the international students this attracts.”
Real Estate Worldwide’s MD, David Coates adds,
“We have seen the year-on-year rise of international applications and acceptances. In a sector that brings billions of pounds of inward invest into the country, the UK institutions spearheading this strategy have chosen the perfect time to make these steps for further success and continued growth. We have no Brexit fears when it comes to our clients investing in student accommodation as it provides a service linked to a product that everyone needs. With strategies like this over-demand and under-supply of student housing will continue to be an issue to be overcome by UK universities, councils and the PBSA sector.”
SOURCE ICEF Monitor is a dedicated market intelligence resource for the international education industry.